<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>LorenzVauck.com Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.lorenzvauck.com</link>
	<description>All about my life, my music, and my mastering</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on VBR MP3 Encoding by: Lorenz</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>Hi Reece,

I can only agree completely, you &quot;hit the nail on the top&quot;, so spoken :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Reece,</p>
	<p>I can only agree completely, you &#8220;hit the nail on the top&#8221;, so spoken <img src='http://www.lorenzvauck.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on VBR MP3 Encoding by: Reece</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Hi Lorenz,

Sort of on a related point (to MP3s, digital music, etc.) -- what are your views on iPods?  One thought I have, and I suspect you agree, is that their prevalance is yet another reason why mastering is so important; i.e. even those expecting only a 'small' distribution for their tracks may be quite surprised by just how successful their music is / how often it ends up being listened to.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Lorenz,</p>
	<p>Sort of on a related point (to MP3s, digital music, etc.) &#8212; what are your views on iPods?  One thought I have, and I suspect you agree, is that their prevalance is yet another reason why mastering is so important; i.e. even those expecting only a &#8217;small&#8217; distribution for their tracks may be quite surprised by just how successful their music is / how often it ends up being listened to.  What do you think?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on VBR MP3 Encoding by: Lorenz</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Hi Hans,

OGG is indeed a very good format and especially at lower bitrates it delivers better quality than an &quot;un-optimized encoded&quot; MP3. However, the main problem of OGG is that it is not yet wide-spread for internet distribution compared to MP3. The majority of the portable players available today still don´t support this format and until this doesn´t change, my clients still want me to deliver the best sounding MP3´s possible for release of their music on the internet.

Regards,
Lorenz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Hans,</p>
	<p>OGG is indeed a very good format and especially at lower bitrates it delivers better quality than an &#8220;un-optimized encoded&#8221; MP3. However, the main problem of OGG is that it is not yet wide-spread for internet distribution compared to MP3. The majority of the portable players available today still don´t support this format and until this doesn´t change, my clients still want me to deliver the best sounding MP3´s possible for release of their music on the internet.</p>
	<p>Regards,<br />
Lorenz
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on VBR MP3 Encoding by: hakre</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lorenzvauck.com/general/vbr-mp3-encoding/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>I know you're talking about MP3s here, but when I listened to OGG encoded stuff, I was very impressed about the quality compared to MP3. Maybe I've got more loss with my &quot;ordinary&quot; encoded 192k MP3 songs then you (I guess so ;) ), so for the noob it is better to choose OGG, isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I know you&#8217;re talking about MP3s here, but when I listened to OGG encoded stuff, I was very impressed about the quality compared to MP3. Maybe I&#8217;ve got more loss with my &#8220;ordinary&#8221; encoded 192k MP3 songs then you (I guess so <img src='http://www.lorenzvauck.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), so for the noob it is better to choose OGG, isn&#8217;t it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
